From Warner Bros.:
Starring Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman, PRACTICAL MAGIC 2 returns to a world steeped in moonlit mischief and powerful ancestral magic, as the Owens sisters must confront the dark curse that threatens to unravel their family once and for all in a must-see cinematic event of fun, magic and mayhem.
I've never had a strong connection with 1998’s Practical Magic. I’ve seen the Griffin-Dunne-directed film (for the first time in the last year) and moderately enjoyed it, but nothing has drawn me to it since. The witchy concept and cult following of this film were completely unknown to me until my time in college, and while I wouldn’t place myself in the fan category, I understand the appeal.
Practical Magic has elite fall vibes, and its story of love between the Owens sisters I’m sure speaks to white women and white gays everywhere. The story is incredibly convoluted, however, and might struggle to maintain attention from some. Practical Magic 2 has more of the magnetic fall vibes of the first, and is at times funnier and more emotional, but its length and thin supporting characters actively work against what is almost a better film.
Practical Magic 2 follows the witch Owens sisters, Sally and Gillian (Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman, respectively), as middle-aged women with the same personalities as in the original film. Sally, pragmatic and neurotic as ever, has two grown daughters, Kylie and Antonia (Joey King and Maisie Willians, respectively), both of whom are shielded from the truth about their family's witchy nature, while Gillian still maintains a never-ending cycle of boyfriends. After a cascade of life-altering events, Kylie embarks on a journey to alter her family's curse in England while her mother and aunt must track her down with the help of Ian Wright (Lee Pace), a mysterious man with ties to the Owens' ancestral hometown.
Just as with the first, this sequel bears strong themes of sisterhood. There are new sisters here - Sally’s daughters Kylie and Antonia appeared in the first film but have been recast and given more substantive roles here - and the film attempts to convince the audience that it cares about them and their parallels to Sally and Gillian, but the only characters to care about here are the original pair. An early sequence of shocking emotional resonance featuring their Aunts Jet and Frances (Dianne Wiest and Stockard Channing, respectively) represents the strongest sense of familial love, but from then on, it’s the Sandra and Nicole show.
There is not much space for any character other than the famed Owens sisters here. Sally’s daughter Kylie’s importance to the story affords Joey King more screen time than I would’ve liked as I can’t bring myself to stand her, but her other daughter Antonia might as well not even be in the film. Every male character suffers from thin characterization as well, particularly Xolo Maridueña’s randomly important Gideon, but I bear less issue with that since the film is (or, at least, should be) about women. It’s evident that Bullock and Kidman are the stars here, I just wish the film was written less with that in mind.
A gripe I have with both Practical Magic films: Everything is about sisterhood and the power of sisterly love, yet the entire plots of both films function around a man’s life. In the first, Gillian’s abusive boyfriend dies and is resurrected (more than once) and becomes the central antagonist. In the second, the story doesn’t start until Kylie’s boyfriend Gideon is incapacitated by a severe car accident, leading Kylie - and her mom and aunt - on a journey to save his life.
The first works mainly because of its era - 90s cult classics are often characterized by their misgivings, largely against women - but the second doesn’t have much of an excuse. In a film about familial bonds being stronger than all, a sisterly bond at that, why are the main characters coded as insecure and incomplete without the love of a man? The entirety of Practical Magic 2 doesn’t happen without the man. Sure, the greater story is about breaking the family’s curse, but Kylie is only spurred to do that because of a man. He is the only engine driving Kylie and her erratic decisions, which are the only engines driving her mother, who is the only engine driving her sister, etc.
I’m sure there’s a (better) version of this film where saving the man is more of an afterthought, but I’m not reviewing the film I want to see - I’m reviewing the film that I saw.
Practical Magic 2 is TOO DAMN LONG. Late in the film, there’s a scene where the third act antagonist - a young man who agrees to help Kylie under false pretenses - is delivering his motivation monologue. There’s a moment where his sound drowns out, and Bullock’s Sally has an entire conversation with her daughter during it. That’s what the whole movie felt like to me, especially as we entered the overlong third act.
The 130-minute film (almost an entire half-hour longer than the original) drags on and on - a common issue with long-delayed sequels as the filmmakers clearly feel it important to allow the nostalgia-baited audience as much time in the film’s world as possible - to points where I start to care about something else, even during important moments. The story ends about 25 minutes before the film does, and it’s only further emphasized by the film’s excessive music cues and needle drops.
From Stevie Nicks to Olivia Rodrigo, this music in this film doesn’t stop. Every time it feels like it should, there are always at least 8 more songs coming up. The film is clearly building to the iconic “midnight margaritas” song, “Coconut” by Harry Nilsson, and some of the pulls by music supervisors Season Kent, Gabe Hilfer (with reported help from Bullock) are impressive, but even once that song plays, there are still more on the way. I found myself truly annoyed at the length of this film, even in moments when I was enjoying it.
Everyone’s new faces are snatched back to the gods and they all look amazing.
Sandra Bullock, in her first role since 2022, plays “Type A” very well. In many of her films - Miss Congeniality, The Heat, etc - her comedy comes from that personality type, and this film is no different. Her Sally is the perfect hilariously angsty mom against Kidman’s Gilly and her laid-back, “Type B” aunt, and the two still have great chemistry together. Kidman’s performance never quite leaves the flitty drunkard arena, but it’s always fun to see her have fun on a set.
I must also say that this film’s depiction of sisterhood between the two characters doesn’t do much to dispel the already-popular lesbian headcanon that fans of the last thirty years have ascribed to the original film. Obviously, these characters are straight and siblings, but surely the writers must know they’ve only added fuel to the brightly burning AO3 fire. Those fan-fiction writers are going to have a BALL this time around.
Maybe it was the two large margaritas we were gifted as the audience at my press screening, but a part of me enjoyed Practical Magic 2 more than the original film. The first clearly feels like a more novel idea, though both are based on a book series, but the second has a much more comedic execution and stronger emotional beats. Whether because of the film itself or the at least 50 oz. of pineapple coconut margarita swirling through me in a dark theater, I just felt more invested this time around, even with the story and pacing issues.
Viewed on 9/1/26 at press screening
Published on 9/8/26